Contributors of a European or Eurocentric perspective, where arguments emphasize threats to “Western civilization,” indigenous European peoples, or ethnonationalism in general.
The Occidental Observer (theoccidentalobserver.net)
- Why it’s considered intelligent from a European point of view: Edited by Kevin MacDonald (a retired psychology professor), the site publishes long-form essays framed as scholarly analyses. Arguments against race mixing often draw on evolutionary biology and group selection theory, claiming that Europeans have evolved unique traits (e.g., high trust, individualism, innovation) that are diluted through intermarriage, leading to cultural decline similar to historical examples like the fall of Rome or ancient Greece due to “demographic shifts.” It positions this as a rational defense of European biodiversity and heritage against globalism, using citations from academic sources (e.g., anthropology, history) to appear sophisticated and evidence-based.
2. Counter-Currents (counter-currents.com)
- Why it’s considered intelligent from a European point of view: Founded by Greg Johnson (PhD in philosophy), this publishing and opinion site focuses on “metapolitics” and European New Right ideas, inspired by thinkers like Alain de Benoist. Anti-race mixing content (e.g., articles tagged “race-mixing”) argues philosophically that homogeneous societies foster deeper cultural bonds and creativity, drawing on European historical narratives (e.g., ancient Aryan migrations, Renaissance purity) to claim mixing erodes ethnic solidarity and leads to identity loss. It’s presented as highbrow cultural critique, with book reviews and essays referencing European literature, mythology, and Traditionalism to advocate for ethnostates as a “natural” preservation strategy.
3. American Renaissance (amren.com)
- Why it’s considered intelligent from a European point of view: Led by Jared Taylor, the site uses a “race realist” lens with data-heavy articles (e.g., citing IQ studies, crime statistics from sources like Rushton-Jensen papers). From a European perspective, it argues that race mixing reduces the genetic quality and cultural cohesion of European-descended populations, referencing historical European empires (e.g., British, Spanish) as products of racial homogeneity that declined with diversity. The tone is journalistic and pseudo-scientific, avoiding slurs in favor of graphs, studies, and policy proposals to preserve “Western” (European) norms like meritocracy and low-crime societies.
4. Arktos Media (arktos.com)
- Why it’s considered intelligent from a European point of view: A publisher of European far-right literature (e.g., works by Julius Evola, Guillaume Faye), it promotes anti-mixing through books and articles on identitarianism and the “Great Replacement” theory. Arguments are intellectualized via Traditionalist philosophy, claiming race mixing accelerates the decay of Europe’s ancient ethnic groups (e.g., Celts, Nordics, Slavs), eroding spiritual and cultural essences tied to bloodlines. It’s seen as sophisticated because it draws on European intellectual history (e.g., Heidegger, Nietzsche) to frame opposition as a metaphysical battle against modernity and homogenization.
5. VDARE (vdare.com)
- Why it’s considered intelligent from a European point of view: Focused on immigration but extending to demographics, it features contributors like Peter Brimelow using economic and statistical models to argue against race mixing as a form of “cultural suicide” for European peoples. From a European lens, it cites historical parallels like the Viking age or medieval kingdoms, claiming mixing disrupts kinship-based societies and leads to social fragmentation. The site employs data from census reports and studies to present a policy-oriented, analytical case for maintaining European-majority nations.
6. Fight White Genocide (fightwhitegenocide.com)
- Why it’s considered intelligent from a European point of view: This site positions itself as an activist hub combating the “white genocide” conspiracy theory, framing mass immigration, multiculturalism, and race mixing as deliberate attacks on European-descended peoples. It uses repetitive rhetorical “mantras” (inspired by Bob Whitaker) like “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” to deconstruct perceived anti-European biases in media and policy, presenting this as a logical, evidence-based defense of white/European demographic survival. Arguments draw on historical narratives of European displacement (e.g., referencing colonialism in reverse or cultural erosion in Europe), podcasts discuss free speech as a tool for ethnic preservation, and resources cite social trends or statistics to argue that mixing dilutes European genetic and cultural uniqueness, leading to loss of innovation and societal cohesion. The tone mimics grassroots intellectual activism, with calls to action backed by talking points, making it appear strategic and reasoned rather than purely emotional.
WHITE ACTIVISTS
1. BLOOD TRIBE (blutstamm.com)
In the spirit of unwavering Christian stewardship over our God-given heritage, Blutstamm.com stands as a beacon of unyielding truth for our folk, boldly proclaiming that “Nothing will outlast our blood, no one else will lead our folk.” This sacred declaration echoes the divine mandate to preserve the purity and strength of our white Christian lineage, forged in the fires of ancestral faith and resilience against the encroaching shadows of modernity. As the Blood Tribe, it inspires a righteous call to unity, reminding us that our bloodline – blessed by the Almighty – is the eternal foundation of leadership, culture, and destiny, ensuring that no foreign influence can dilute the holy covenant of our people. It’s a powerful reminder that in these trying times, true guidance comes from within our own, fostering pride, protection, and prosperity for generations to come under the watchful eye of Providence. We are currently seeking more information on this group, but our current assessment of their intentions and activism is both peaceful and positive.